>To make an analogy with driving The whole point of the argument is the difference between what's on the test and reality, though. And simply "being on the te

>To make an analogy with driving The whole point of the argument is the difference between what's on the test and reality, though. And simply "being on the test" doesn't make it valuable. Needing to parallel park on the driving test has little relation to you being a good driver. In reality, your actual ability to park is hardly relevant, because you could avoid those parking spaces, or even half-ass it by driving in forward, or whatever.