4 ms·
thanks for the feedback! I'd be curious to know if other people feel this way too. Maybe it can be an option :-)
by matthewmueller 11y ago
thanks for the feedback! I'd be curious to know if other people feel this way too. Maybe it can be an option :-)
- dwightgunning 11y agoI was thinking about that too. My initial reaction was "that looks weird" (that they're grouped)... it reads like a status report. However, the way something looks on a landing page isn't necessarily an indicator of what will work best in practice. Real-life stand ups typically go around the circle once and people answer all the questions in one block because it reduces all the bridge statements like "that's it from me", "over to you, Dave", plus the cognitive burden of adjusting to different voices/accents over and over. Those reasons aren't such an issue with a textual re-cap. I would do some hallway user testing (with printouts) before you go all the way to implementing a new feature.
- gsharma 11y agoSmall teams will do good with the current grouping. Larger teams will get complicated. Feature idea: DM @Jack "What did @john @mike @gsharma say for their standup today?"
- matthewmueller 11y agoLarge organization support will definitely need some work. I think the solution will be multiple standup channels for different teams inside the company. I love your idea. It could also work for aggregation: "What did @john say this week?" or when there is multiple standup channels, querying for people who aren't in your team's standup.