4 ms·

It bothers me more that they all tend to be reskins of conventional imperative languages. It’s fun when it’s a joke, but a lot of non-joke languages are built t

It bothers me more that they all tend to be reskins of conventional imperative languages. It’s fun when it’s a joke, but a lot of non-joke languages are built the same way. We don’t need new syntax for the same semantics—we need new semantics.

mapmeld 11y ago
It's closer to a functional language though--there's a break statement but no return statement
chippy 11y ago
They should re-do it in the Urbit language/thing