The #1 problem is with p-values is the word "significant". We should use "detectable" instead. Significant implies meaningful to most people, but not in a stati

The #1 problem is with p-values is the word "significant". We should use "detectable" instead. Significant implies meaningful to most people, but not in a statistical context. This is quite confusing. Detectable is better because the mainstream meaning aligns with the jargon. So: > "Discovering statistically significant biclusters in gene expression data" becomes: > "Discovering statistically detectable biclusters in gene expression data" This rephrasing makes it evident that "statistically detectable" adds little to the title. So the title becomes > "Discovering biclusters in gene expression data" A better title.