While I admit it was wrong to claim that all meta-analysis is bad, the main point of my argument has not been refuted. You cannot inspect 100 papers and make a

While I admit it was wrong to claim that all meta-analysis is bad, the main point of my argument has not been refuted. You cannot inspect 100 papers and make a truth claim that is stronger than the quality of the papers, and doing so is a folly. Nobody in maths uses meta-analysis to prove a theorem.