If the studies were reversed I think my opinion would be the same. We don't know that much about ego depletion. If it exists or what's driving it. I think it

If the studies were reversed I think my opinion would be the same. We don't know that much about ego depletion. If it exists or what's driving it. I think it means ego depletion is much more fragile than we thought or is caused by some other phenomenon. I don't think this study means the thing we called ego depletion doesn't exist and is an artifact of publication bias and chance. It seems to me like there were just too many studies replicating it for that to be true.