Don't all restrictive laws by their definition violate human rights? 'Rights' is the sphere of activity the law agrees not to encroach. This question is tautolo

Don't all restrictive laws by their definition violate human rights? 'Rights' is the sphere of activity the law agrees not to encroach. This question is tautological. Better question -- given that legalizing psychedelics will make 1% of us healthier or better at our jobs at the cost of doubling the pedestrian strike rate in large cities, do metropolitan mayors want to make that trade?