4 ms·
FWIW, I would take the strong stance that it damn well should be.
by LesZedCB 11y ago
FWIW, I would take the strong stance that it damn well should be.
- achamayou 11y agoBut what's pollution-free? Taken to the extreme, this implies nobody can drive, or light a camp fire for that matter. It's all about quantity, and balancing the conflicting freedoms of individuals. Your right to breathe perfectly clean air goes against my right to produce energy and heat myself or go places. Likewise, there's a general consensus that the state can detain you temporarily. It's an affront to the freedom of the person detained, but most individuals agree that it's necessary to preserve their freedom to go about safely and without fear of violence. There's a process around it, to try and balance the rights on both sides. It's all in the details and the implementation.