3 ms·
A monopoly is characterized by a lack of competition. Microsoft gave away IE to get customers locked in, which in turn let them use their "Embrace, Extend, Exti
by delecti 11y ago
A monopoly is characterized by a lack of competition. Microsoft gave away IE to get customers locked in, which in turn let them use their "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" strategy.
Similarly Amazon sold at a loss to get customers to use their gateway above all others. Their strategy is to take a cut from so many pies that it doesn't matter that their slices are so small. They're okay if some of those slices end up not covering their costs as long as none of their competition gets any pie at all.
- WalterBright 11y agoI have thousands of books, constantly buy more, and have no trouble at all buying them from sources other than the Apple and Amazon alleged monopolies.
- Pyxl101 11y agoApple wasn't alleged to be a monopoly. Appled formed an illegal cartel of suppliers, all who agreed to fix their prices simultaneously as part of a scheme to raise prices across the industry - by acting in concert to force everyone (all supplier, all retailers, including non-Apple) to adopt an agency model giving publishers the market power to raise their prices. More details: https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/486701/download https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/486701/downlo... - there are clear emails showing how Apple orchestrating the scheme by gaining coordinating and gaining cooperation of all publishers, and then of pricing data showing how consumers were harmed as ebook prices rose as the scheme went into effect. See my other comment in this thread for some choice excerpts from leaders of the companies involved, betraying their conscious involvement.