> That's the case with most OSS C++ projects - even on Windows it's best to just build from source. Yes, it's better. Building clang+llvm takes about 2 hours

> That's the case with most OSS C++ projects - even on Windows it's best to just build from source. Yes, it's better. Building clang+llvm takes about 2 hours on my machine. Last time I used the prebuilt binaries to check the status of C++17 in clang. I remember looking at the paths with "ldd" to see if their clang linked properly with their llvm. It was OK. There is an ongoing ABI change in gcc for C++. Maybe it's finished now.