3 ms·
Reason why your downvoted is because compression can often add to computation. An exanple would be - I have a pallet of bytes, this will cause colors to be sto
by formula1 11y ago
Reason why your downvoted is because compression can often add to computation. An exanple would be
- I have a pallet of bytes, this will cause colors to be stored in a 8 bit integer instead of a 32 bit one (8 for r,b,g,a) - every color now adds alook up to that memory address
- I turn every color sequence possible into a numerator + denominator pair < 256 when possible. I add a length and offset to define how to compute it - when you reach a sequence, you must calculate the number. Find the offset (up to 256) and until the length (ideally > than 4 bytes) is reached get the value of that digit.
These types of calculations seem small, and likely are more often than not. But you add enough of these things up and all of a sudden the cpu must hit 100% for the time of 30+ images
- dave2000 11y agoI don't care about my score. I could have guessed why though. People not reading things properly. I was taking point with the observation that the site said it was better. I pointed out that it didn't say that, just that the compression ratio was better.
- teh_klev 11y ago> People not reading things properly I did read the article twice and thoroughly, all I sawmentioned was "Encoding and decoding speeds are acceptable, but should be improved" . That doesn't address the points I raised in my original post if you were to read it properly.