3 ms·

The "original" cloud version is http://deepart.io http://deepart.io As for an easy standalone version, it wouldn't have huge potential, considering the inevita

• LoSboccacc 11y ago
  eh most computer now have some good muscle. also it's an iterative process so you can show a meaningful progress bar to user even if it takes an hour or so people wouldn't complain. and for many it would take minutes - one just need to set the expectations straight.
  • pierrec 11y ago
    "By increasing the server memory to 27GB I manage to create 1024px images on CPU - seven hours per image" - http://spiceprogram.org/artcorn/ http://spiceprogram.org/artcorn/ And the GPU version requires amounts of video memory that generally do not exist for anything else than research or GPGPU purposes. With 4GB of VRAM you might get a 920x690 image processed in under 1 hour, using recent optimizations added to the neural-style repo. So a standalone iOS version seems pretty useless. A standalone Windows version might appeal to people with gaming rigs but without the technical knowledge or determination to install neural-style in its current form. It certainly has potential, just not as huge as the cloud version.
    • mediocrejoker 11y ago
      If you were a serious graphic design professional might not you already have an i7 or a xeon rig with SLI already set up, and be accustomed to leaving a render running overnight?
• mdda 11y ago
  This makes me a little sad, though : "University of Tübingen has a pending patent application for the Neural Art technology."
  • LoSboccacc 11y ago
    I wonder what google would have to say since it's built from deep dream experience. Also it was recently improved with newer tech which may very well be non infringing