3 ms·
> The author is arguing for anarchism, which generally doesn't scale beyond one person Anarchism has been the default way of running the show for most of our s
by circlefavshape 11y ago
> The author is arguing for anarchism, which generally doesn't scale beyond one person
Anarchism has been the default way of running the show for most of our species's existence. Civilization is only 10 thousand years old. Seems to me like it's population density rather than numbers that anarchism has trouble with
- oldmanjay 11y agoThere's also the fact that the historical anarchic societies didn't achieve much, whereas modern civilization...well, you're on the Internet. The point I'm making should be clear.
- nailer 11y ago> Civilization is only 10 thousand years old. Tribal societies generally had leaders, decided by ability, combat, or other means.