3 ms·

Well if someone threating to shoot you, then yes obviously someone is infringing on your liberty... so yes there would rules against that.

• edent 11y ago
  "Threatening? No, sir! I just like walking down the street open-carrying my AK47. And occasionally test firing it at wood-pigeons." Incidentally - who makes the rules against threats? Who enforces them? Seems like we would need a group of people to decide on these rules. But how should we choose those people...?
  • UK-AL 11y ago
    "Threatening? No, sir! I just like walking down the street open-carrying my AK47. And occasionally test firing it at wood-pigeons." - That an excuse, people try to make excuses with the current system to get away with things. It's not exclusive libertarianism. You would get it under any system. "Incidentally - who makes the rules against threats? Who enforces them? Seems like we would need a group of people to decide on these rules. But how should we choose those people...? " There are millions of different versions libertarianism with different solutions. Some with insurance, private police force that work for the insurer. Can't list them all. I personally am a classical liberal, I don't advocate no government just that it should be limited to law, order, military etc