I'm sorry, the initial analogy, that a condom is easy to pierce was just an example for the general assumption, that security is easy if the thread is not purpo

I'm sorry, the initial analogy, that a condom is easy to pierce was just an example for the general assumption, that security is easy if the thread is not purposefully malignant, for varying measures of malignant. Someone who doesn't even understand that and that the linguistic argument is of the table, and still keeps going, shouldn't try to talk about logic, as right as some of the individual arguments might be. Ana-logically, I shouldn't be writing any more about this.