3 ms·
That's always a question of proportion. It's all in the mix. It's sure carcinogenic and surely beats the lung up in a lot of ways. It also does statistically, b
by conceit 11y ago
That's always a question of proportion. It's all in the mix. It's sure carcinogenic and surely beats the lung up in a lot of ways. It also does statistically, by my own observation, lead to a significant lack of all kinds of activities.
For example, it frequently leads to a lack of believe in - or even just consideration for - how terrible substance consumption is, over all if not for the sake of nutrition.
- mystikal 11y agoAlso if you are prone to developing a psychotic disorder (prevalence of psychotic disorders is ~3%), pot consumption before the age of 20 increases the chances of it happening.
- conceit 11y agoWhich is probably just a consequence of other complications.
- mystikal 11y agoThis is a fairly neutral review of the literature: http://cannabisandpsychosis.ca/more-information/what-do-we-know/what-is-the-evidence-saying/ http://cannabisandpsychosis.ca/more-information/what-do-we-k...
- conceit 11y agothere is not a single source given, just wiki links
- mystikal 11y agoThere are plenty of sources and the original papers are easily found, but there isn't a proper bibliography with links which I agree is frustrating. For example the first one says the last name of the author and the year: Andreasson and 1987. So I googled "Andreasson 1987 cannabis" and found the article: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2887%2992620-1/abstract http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67... Hope this helps.