3 ms·
I found your addition very interesting. But I think the "Tesla fans" referred to, are referring to something different. The Tesla vehicles are "missing" a lot
by georgefrick 11y ago
I found your addition very interesting. But I think the "Tesla fans" referred to, are referring to something different.
The Tesla vehicles are "missing" a lot of parts that rust, corrode, and cause engineering challenges. One of the main ones behind the exhaust system. Speak with a series of car mechanics and they'll invariably tell stories of cars that never received an oil change until something fails.
There are videos, pictures, and documentation of Tesla being able to swap drive trains, etc.
Put together, Tesla is able to better protect the frame and body from corrosion by separating it from the same parts that usually "Carry this along". That's a lot of text to say they reduce the surface area and mass of corrosion and failure prone parts.
This isn't to say I agree, but I find the information all fascinating (as a car guy). The best way to make a car, in my mind; more serviceable is to increase the protections from rust and corrosion. Otherwise a simple brake pad ends up being an entire brake system upon repair attempt. In regards to electronics; they can go in sealed compartments and be easily serviced. How awesome. They can also just as easily be replaced by a superior implementation.
Anyways, your post made me ramble a bit but I'm trying to determine if I agree with the original post or not.
- WalterBright 11y agoI have an 89 Ford. It has been parked outside in rainy Seattle for 20 some years. Other than the exhaust system, it is free of corrosion. I find this rather incredible. Ford has done a truly amazing job with corrosion protection, unlike my older car which rusts when a cloud passes by. I also have to compliment Ford on building a low maintenance vehicle that is also cheap and simple to repair when it does go wrong.