I think the OP is being kind.... I question even the validity of fingerprint matching one of the oldest "Forensic science" fields. Almost nothing in "Forensic

I think the OP is being kind.... I question even the validity of fingerprint matching one of the oldest "Forensic science" fields. Almost nothing in "Forensic science" follows the actual scientific method. There is far far far far far too many assumptions, "intuitive leaps", and formation of a preconceived narrative round "science" They make the evidence fit their story, vs allowing the evidence to tell a story.