3 ms·

Any conviction in which microscopic hair analysis was presented to the jury should be automatically tossed and a retrial conducted... Period, end of discussio

Any conviction in which microscopic hair analysis was presented to the jury should be automatically tossed and a retrial conducted... Period, end of discussion That is if you want a justice system, not a legal system I have a feeling you want a legal system and do not give a shit about justice.

superuser2 11y ago
> and a retrial conducted So you admit they are not "obviously innocent," but deserving of a retrial. I agree. >I have a feeling you want a legal system and do not give a shit about justice. That's a hell of a lot to infer from my comment which, as far as I can tell, doesn't even disagree with you.
- the_ancient 11y ago
  One is assumed to be innocent, thus if the trail they were convicted under it tainted, then until such time they are retried and found guilty using untainted testimony or actual science then yes these people are in fact "obviously innocent" I made the statement about you wanting a Legal System because based on the comments you seem to be more focused on the procedure and technical aspects of the law than on the miscarriage of justice that the FBI and their Fake Hair Science has caused. You want to leave it to Judges and Prosecutors to guess at the state of mind of the Jurors to figure out how much the jury may have considered the Hair Analysis, Only a person looking for a Legal system would make that comment. If you want justice you understand that there is no way to figure out how much that testimony factored into the jury, thus EVERY case it was offered in should be vacated.. TODAY. and everyone person convicted should be released. TODAY. then they can figure out who can be retried using actual evidence and attempt to get convictions with new juries Further any Plea Bargains that were reached by threatening to use FBI Hair Analysis should also be Vacated, how many people where extorted into pleading guilty by prosecutors because they threaten this "scientific evidence"?

superuser2 11y ago

> and a retrial conducted So you admit they are not "obviously innocent," but deserving of a retrial. I agree. >I have a feeling you want a legal system and do not give a shit about justice. That's a hell of a lot to infer from my comment which, as far as I can tell, doesn't even disagree with you.

the_ancient 11y ago
One is assumed to be innocent, thus if the trail they were convicted under it tainted, then until such time they are retried and found guilty using untainted testimony or actual science then yes these people are in fact "obviously innocent" I made the statement about you wanting a Legal System because based on the comments you seem to be more focused on the procedure and technical aspects of the law than on the miscarriage of justice that the FBI and their Fake Hair Science has caused. You want to leave it to Judges and Prosecutors to guess at the state of mind of the Jurors to figure out how much the jury may have considered the Hair Analysis, Only a person looking for a Legal system would make that comment. If you want justice you understand that there is no way to figure out how much that testimony factored into the jury, thus EVERY case it was offered in should be vacated.. TODAY. and everyone person convicted should be released. TODAY. then they can figure out who can be retried using actual evidence and attempt to get convictions with new juries Further any Plea Bargains that were reached by threatening to use FBI Hair Analysis should also be Vacated, how many people where extorted into pleading guilty by prosecutors because they threaten this "scientific evidence"?