7 ms·

Heyyyyyy ... http://i.imgur.com/VucG9gy.png http://i.imgur.com/VucG9gy.png ... That's basically Spotify (desktop application). The resemblance being so high mak

by pen2l 11y ago

Heyyyyyy ... http://i.imgur.com/VucG9gy.png http://i.imgur.com/VucG9gy.png ... That's basically Spotify (desktop application). The resemblance being so high makes this a little iffy, and suggests this project won't stay up (at least in its present form) for too long. That said, why hasn't Google yet created a desktop application for Google Play Music? It's mind-boggling to me. I would love to ditch Spotify (primarily because 1) I don't like its searching/discovery UI, and 2) its desktop application is slow and buggy as well)

on_and_off 11y ago
>That said, why hasn't Google yet created a desktop application for Google Play Music? I don't understand the need (and I guess that Google does not either). Is it because you need an offline mode ? That's the only addition I can think of. With the play music chrome extension, the website responds to media keys, so outside of a dedicated app icon in the tray (even though the miniplayer has one), I don't see what a desktop app would bring.
- esailija 11y ago
  Even without extensions, those things are possible or will soon be possible[1] on the web out of the box (except tray icon but persistent notification with actions can be done to achieve something similar). 1. https://github.com/whatwg/mediasession#use-cases https://github.com/whatwg/mediasession#use-cases
- JoBrad 11y ago
  You can also play your local music with apps like Spotify. No desktop client is a huge issue for me.
  - lern_too_spel 11y ago
    The only reason Spotify needs the ability to play local music is to play music that is not on Spotify. Most other services, including this Google one, let you upload your collection to play on any device.
    - detaro 11y ago
      Why would I want to waste bandwidth/traffic quota on music I have locally?
      - on_and_off 11y ago
        because that way you don't need to keep these files locally. My collection is quite large, it is backed on a hard drive and also available on Play Music. Since they have a good matching algorithm, uploading an album is often instantaneous. It is probably not for everyone, but I really like this service.
        detaro 11y ago
        Ok, maybe I worded that to strongly. It is a great feature as an option, but IMHO the software should still be able to use local files if they are available.
mbilker 11y ago
This is Electron-based, but it looks a lot more integration than a normal Electron skin. I consider it may be worth looking into especially with the media button integration.
markdown 11y ago
> That's basically Spotify Looks pretty generic to me. Grooveshark had a similar look.
jc4p 11y ago
And this is what play.google.com/music/listen looks like: http://i.imgur.com/9dmTu6h.jpg http://i.imgur.com/9dmTu6h.jpg :)
- zouhair 11y ago
  And when you click on the mini-player button at the lower right corner you get, you guessed it, a mini-player.
intopieces 11y ago
From their perspective, they have a desktop application for Google Play Music in the form of the Chrome browser.
midgetjones 11y ago
So Spotify move all their infrastructure from AWS to Google Cloud, and now this? Seems pretty obvious what's going on here...

by pen2l 11y ago

on_and_off 11y ago

>That said, why hasn't Google yet created a desktop application for Google Play Music? I don't understand the need (and I guess that Google does not either). Is it because you need an offline mode ? That's the only addition I can think of. With the play music chrome extension, the website responds to media keys, so outside of a dedicated app icon in the tray (even though the miniplayer has one), I don't see what a desktop app would bring.

esailija 11y ago
Even without extensions, those things are possible or will soon be possible[1] on the web out of the box (except tray icon but persistent notification with actions can be done to achieve something similar). 1. https://github.com/whatwg/mediasession#use-cases https://github.com/whatwg/mediasession#use-cases
JoBrad 11y ago
You can also play your local music with apps like Spotify. No desktop client is a huge issue for me.
- lern_too_spel 11y ago
  The only reason Spotify needs the ability to play local music is to play music that is not on Spotify. Most other services, including this Google one, let you upload your collection to play on any device.
  - detaro 11y ago
    Why would I want to waste bandwidth/traffic quota on music I have locally?
    - on_and_off 11y ago
      because that way you don't need to keep these files locally. My collection is quite large, it is backed on a hard drive and also available on Play Music. Since they have a good matching algorithm, uploading an album is often instantaneous. It is probably not for everyone, but I really like this service.
      - detaro 11y ago
        Ok, maybe I worded that to strongly. It is a great feature as an option, but IMHO the software should still be able to use local files if they are available.

mbilker 11y ago

This is Electron-based, but it looks a lot more integration than a normal Electron skin. I consider it may be worth looking into especially with the media button integration.

markdown 11y ago

> That's basically Spotify Looks pretty generic to me. Grooveshark had a similar look.

jc4p 11y ago

And this is what play.google.com/music/listen looks like: http://i.imgur.com/9dmTu6h.jpg http://i.imgur.com/9dmTu6h.jpg :)

zouhair 11y ago
And when you click on the mini-player button at the lower right corner you get, you guessed it, a mini-player.

intopieces 11y ago

From their perspective, they have a desktop application for Google Play Music in the form of the Chrome browser.

midgetjones 11y ago

So Spotify move all their infrastructure from AWS to Google Cloud, and now this? Seems pretty obvious what's going on here...