The article clearly has substance, it just doesn't align with your opinion on the topic. dang definitely didn't "single out" the commenter, which a cursory glan

The article clearly has substance, it just doesn't align with your opinion on the topic. dang definitely didn't "single out" the commenter, which a cursory glance at dang's comment history will corroborate - hell if you go back far enough he's told me the exact same thing. If jheriko had phrased their comment more constructively, there would likely be no issue.