4 ms·
Your tax dollars at work. I would be for this expenditure if it were likely to involve real communication. Instead, your money will be spent to pander to the
by mscantland 17y ago
Your tax dollars at work.
I would be for this expenditure if it were likely to involve real communication. Instead, your money will be spent to pander to the proletariat and to oversimplify issues that align with Obama getting re-elected.
- spamizbad 17y ago> Your tax dollars at work. From the article: 'The Democratic National Committee’s “social networks manager” job description says the position entails maintaining the President’s accounts on Facebook, Twitter and MySpace.' It's a position paid for by the DNC, not the US Government.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- pavs 17y agoYou and your facts have no place here. hush!
- mscantland 17y agoYes, I read the article too. The cost of the twitterer's salary is just a minor part of this maneuver. It is unavoidable that this person will be supported by public resources, just as public resources are used for anything else which involves the president. His vacation to Hawaii, for example was estimated to cost $100MM source: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/12/21/the-cost-of-obamas-hawaiian-vacation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/12/21/the-cost-of-ob...