I used to really enjoy such posts - ones that celebrated the weirdness and unpredictability of software. The Zen of the argument Jeff Atwood presents is appeali

I used to really enjoy such posts - ones that celebrated the weirdness and unpredictability of software. The Zen of the argument Jeff Atwood presents is appealing for some reason. However, reading such articles now I cannot help but think they contain too little substance. As I understand the reasoning it is this: I'm a relatively good programmer and yet I'm incompetent => The world is full of bad programmers => Most software is badly written => I hate software. Perhaps that currently holds. However, to imply that it will always hold is intellectually crippling. To demonstrate this, all we need to do is look at our premise (axiom?) and rephrase it slightly: "Any good programmer is still incompetent". I personally don't see any reason why this should be self-evident and every reason to find ways to change it.