3 ms·
Sid is unstable, isn't it? I tried it a bit but it's very (very) unstable :-) I come from Fedora and have few months only on debian. Still a rookie.
by vmorgulis 11y ago
Sid is unstable, isn't it?
I tried it a bit but it's very (very) unstable :-)
I come from Fedora and have few months only on debian. Still a rookie.
- toyg 11y agoYeah, Sid is the rolling unstable. It's still slower and relatively more stable than most rolling distributions, but it's constantly changing here and there and everywhere. Using it as your main desktop machine is a recipe for trouble, especially when major changes start rolling in. The only certainty with Sid is that your disk will work a lot because of the firehose of updated packages streaming in at every hour...
- vmorgulis 11y ago> .. It's still slower and relatively more stable than most rolling distributions ... My experience is a "non-beta" Fedora is less stable than a "testing" debian. > ...Using it as your main desktop machine is a recipe for trouble ... Yes! It's a nightmare especially with Gnome Shell. I see memory corruptions for months in Gnome windows. I wonder if it's related to Wayland stuff. It often occurs in Firefox.