3 ms·
Why not both? I have a few laptops, and a high-end desktop; I get the best possible performance when I'm working at a desk, and acceptable performance when I'm
by teacup50 11y ago
Why not both? I have a few laptops, and a high-end desktop; I get the best possible performance when I'm working at a desk, and acceptable performance when I'm traveling.
- rayiner 11y agoIt's a pain keeping multiple computers in sync. And my laptop is a 2.7GHz Core i7 with 20GB of RAM that's more than fast enough for anything I do.
- teacup50 11y agoIt's really not a pain; just update the SCM working copy. If your project has tendrils into the local system, that's the real problem to fix, because it's going to introduce pointless inefficiency at every level: new developer setup, production deployment, support for enterprise-installation, and ... inability to use the ideal hardware. available. Performance translates directly into working efficiency. There's no such thing as "fast enough", there's only "too expensive".