3 ms·
Interesting and well written. However, being an agnostic I offer this: From A Scientific Rationale for Belief in God http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/God_AI.ht
by yannis 17y ago
Interesting and well written. However, being an agnostic I offer this:
From A Scientific Rationale for Belief in God http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/God_AI.html http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/God_AI.html
>I present here a concise rationale for the existence of God. The work of Ray Kurzweil and other artificial intelligence researchers is critical to my thesis. An entity (computers or humans, it not mattering which) will eventually become all-knowing. How much time passes before what is likely to be a rapid convergence to all-knowing is not important...
- donaq 17y agoI stopped reading when the author made a leap in logic from superhuman intelligence to omniscience, and then from omniscience to time travel just within the abstract. This was obviously not a well thought out piece.
- eagleal 17y agoI didn't read it just because he says that Kurzweil is critical to his thesis.