I question the validity of any assessment that is presented to assessors (the paying customers) as a verified and reliable instrument, but then presented to the

I question the validity of any assessment that is presented to assessors (the paying customers) as a verified and reliable instrument, but then presented to the assessed as a "starting point", and who should be instructed "...that the respondent is the expert; the only person who can verify which type fits best."[1] It may test something to some degree of accuracy, but when the makers of the test turn it into a game of picking which of 16 all-positive self-descriptions they like the most, I have to wonder what the point is beyond being a well-marketed horoscope. [1] http://www.myersbriggs.org/myers-and-briggs-foundation/ethical-use-of-the-mbti-instrument/ethical-feedback.asp http://www.myersbriggs.org/myers-and-briggs-foundation/ethic...