3 ms·
If they're going to video the interview and make it public then there needs to be a minimum cap that's publicized on the website. Fair is fair. This is pretty
by Alex3917 11y ago
If they're going to video the interview and make it public then there needs to be a minimum cap that's publicized on the website. Fair is fair.
This is pretty clever though, can't wait to see where it goes.
- tyingq 11y agoThe prominent placement of the "didn't fund this company" videos seems a bit harsh, there's even a red background striked text label showing you how much they were denied. This particular thumbnail caught my eye...ouch: http://i.imgur.com/03f63JZ.png http://i.imgur.com/03f63JZ.png
- neves 11y agoLooks like a Trump company: you are fired!
- Alex3917 11y agoSure, that's their marketing. I don't think it would be unfair if the terms were reasonable, right now they're not. But if there were a minimum cap and we were talking 3 months of funding instead of one month then this would totally be a viable option. Maybe not a first choice option, but at least a reasonable backup plan.
- partisan 11y agoIt is in poor taste, for sure. That said, I am now watching that video to understand what went wrong.
- dyeje 11y agoIronically, that particular interview is pretty positive.