2 ms·
A really good strategy which is unfornately not very common. For one part because of the topic of the article, but for the second part because many companies se
by sgift 11y ago
A really good strategy which is unfornately not very common. For one part because of the topic of the article, but for the second part because many companies seem to think that their employees will be hired away by their competitors at the first opportunity, which basically says that they do not trust themselves to be good enough to retain their employees .. but if these companies do not trust themselves how can their customers trust them?
- mooreds 11y agoI think it isn't common because it is expensive. People would rather hire someone who has made mistakes on someone else's dime (another word for it is "experience").
- sgift 11y agoYou are right, that is the third component, but hiring is also very expensive, especially if you have a low quote of acceptance and have to interview many candidates for each position.
- mooreds 11y agoGood point. Not sure which is more expensive, and it obviously depends on your problem space and the stakes involved (i.e. crud apps vs financials vs health care).
- dorfsmay 11y agoThere's an often quoted saying out there: "Can you imagine if we train our employees and they leave? Well, can you imagine if we don't train them and they stay?"