3 ms·
Clearly the question then would be, why is the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1966 not unconstitutional, since it "compel a company to convey
by zodiac 11y ago
Clearly the question then would be, why is the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1966 not unconstitutional, since it "compel a company to convey a message it disagrees with"?
(I don't know the answer and couldn't find it through a quick search - just pointing out what ridgeguy probably meant)
- makomk 11y agoBecause that's a form of commercial speech and only has very limited protections under the First Amendment. Same reason that deceptive advertisements aren't protected.