You stated "Apple is not being forced to send this update to anyone" and stated that it would be compelled speech if they had to publish it "at-large". Which ra

You stated "Apple is not being forced to send this update to anyone" and stated that it would be compelled speech if they had to publish it "at-large". Which raises the question: is compelled speech, made only to the gov't, illegal? That case shows that compelled nonpublic speech can be unconstitutional. Do you disagree? ========================================= HackerNews is _also_ rate limiting me, so here's my reply to the below: ========================================= Ah, okay. I understand your perspective but completely disagree. I think the act of writing the code/speech/doing the signing is what should be protected.