4 ms·
all of them really mean "Hadoop' babysitter with a dash of full-stack ...because that's all that most business require, 99% of the time. To you know, get thin
by kafkaesq 11y ago
all of them really mean "Hadoop' babysitter with a dash of full-stack
...because that's all that most business require, 99% of the time. To you know, get things done and make money and stuff.
Which may not fit your needs, but why be "depressed" about it? It's just the way things are in the commercial world.
If you want someone with more fine-grained stills, try articulating that in your job postings. What we see, all the time, are ads mentioning platform X, with no articulation whatsoever as to where, even on some approximate logarithmic skill, they'd like the skill level and comfort with platform X to be.
- p4wnc6 11y agoThat's rarely why these enterprise frameworks are bought or operated. More often it's for various permutations of the "no one got fired for buying IBM" excuse. Big showy re-orgs around Hadoop are mostly for status effects, hardly ever related to engineering realities. And in the few firms that actually do have real engineering trade-offs that favor the use of those types of frameworks, they tend to hire people who are well-suited for the role, and then create job functions surrounding them that are respectful of aptitudes and skills of the people they hire. In most firms that adopt these frameworks (for status effects), they are just desperate to fill seats and increase engineering headcount. They don't respect your skill set or even care if it matches the business need. They just need to get you in the door, and then find a way to deal with inevitable dissatisfaction later.
- collyw 11y agoYou didn't get picked for the special snowflake job that you trained for then and are made to do grunt work instead? Welcome to the real world.