3 ms·
Some of those are honestly pie in the sky, I'll admit. But still seeing a statement that's where resources would be being spent would be ideal for some of those
by kefka 11y ago
Some of those are honestly pie in the sky, I'll admit. But still seeing a statement that's where resources would be being spent would be ideal for some of those.
With regards to Tor/I2P, It would go a long way to be able to understand that a .onion or .i2p link was clicked and to use an alternate resolver. That would also call for a mode in the browser that sanitizes all user fields and makes the browsers look all exactly the same (to maintain anonymity).
For IPFS, I'd like to see a client-side javascript that handles the peer processing of a node, as well as being able to understand a /ip[n/f]s/hash is an ipfs link. So far, we have resolution via localhost:8080 or ipfs.io/ipfs/hash resolution depending if you're running the peer program or not.
I know that IPFS is actively working on a websockets/client side js for their system, so that any browser can play along, with no noisome downloads or binaries.
And honestly, I didn't know about Servo. I've already enough on my plate, that I didn't need to know about yet another awesome project :)