Surely the value of the data can't be measured by its size, can it? The content must have some reading on its value, no? The $140 million Picasso canvas that w

Surely the value of the data can't be measured by its size, can it? The content must have some reading on its value, no? The $140 million Picasso canvas that woman tore a couple of weeks back is worth more than a 60 inch square of cloth and paint, right? To be honest, I have no idea whether the data itself is worth it. But I'm betting Google does, and that very specific answers to very specific questions have substantial value for them, both from an algorithmic input perspective as well as on a pure content basis. $50M worth? Probably not. But throw in the people, the user community (and remember, that 90K figure was as of October of last year), and the mechanism of getting people to answer other people's questions and I can see the math working. My concern wouldn't be the price. I'd be more worried that Google will mismanage its acquired asset, as they have with other acquisitions.