4 ms·
I agree with your statement. However, that is not what I meant. The poster gcc_programmer was talking about very specific points about how "the stack" (not a st
by scott_s 11y ago
I agree with your statement. However, that is not what I meant. The poster gcc_programmer was talking about very specific points about how "the stack" (not a stack) for a stack-based language gets implemented.
- geographomics 11y agoGood point, thanks for the correction.