3 ms·
This submission: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118659 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118659 links to the web site version which is here: http://
by RiderOfGiraffes 17y ago
This submission:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118659 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118659
links to the web site version which is here:
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2010/02/11/chip-and-pin-is-broken/ http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2010/02/11/chip-and-pin-i...
- lucifer 17y agoThanks, didn't see that.
- RiderOfGiraffes 17y agoYou're welcome. I have a knack for spotting duplicates. Some call it useful, others call it incredibly irritating.
- carbocation 17y agoUpvoted, because I find it to be both.
- RiderOfGiraffes 17y agoThank you - you made me smile. However, I refer you to this comment and its parents: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1122023 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1122023 I'm not going to bother flagging such duplication any more. Even though I find it frustrating to see conversations split across effectively duplicate submissions, it will continue to happen, and I'm just wasting time.
- lanstein 17y agotie goes to the runner, type of deal?
- imurray 17y agoThis topic was also posted at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118779 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118779 — I’m adapting my comment from there as it is relevant to the issue of the topic disappearing. I’m not why this topic has got so little interest. Maybe because it looks like a UK-only issue? EMV chip and pin has been introduced in Canada, and the authors say it is being adopted in the USA. The scheme is designed to put liability with the card holder, so insecurities should be given widespread attention to stop banks from being able to blame their customers for problems with the system.