It is, though I imagine there's better precedential cases for digital acts as speech than Tinker. More importantly, good on you for this: > In my opinion, cod

It is, though I imagine there's better precedential cases for digital acts as speech than Tinker. More importantly, good on you for this: > In my opinion, code in its functional capacity is not speech. This is HUGELY important for people to recognize before arguing that "Code is speech" in an absolute sense. Sure, it seems like a clear-cut position in the Civil Liberties sphere, but then you find all that same protected speech is suddenly subject to © and 35 USC §101.