13 ms·
I think if they're running unmodified code, they could just say "we are running X version Y with no modifications" and link to the upstream and be done with it.
by thom_nic 11y ago
I think if they're running unmodified code, they could just say "we are running X version Y with no modifications" and link to the upstream and be done with it. Which could be the case.
Or they have modified it and are refusing to release the source with their modifications. But they haven't stated the former.
- daemin 11y agoTechnically they don't need to give you the code unless you own that model of car. There's no requirement in the GPL that the code has to be shared to the whole world/everyone. It only needs to be provided to the person that has bought the vehicle which includes said software in compiled form.
- OJFord 11y agoI'm pretty certain they don't distribute source code with cars though, so seeing as the author didn't say "I don't own the car" - and they didn't ask - I think that's moot.
- yaur 11y agoThis is not correct. They need to provide the offer for source to anyone they provide the binaries to (e.g. customers) but the offer has to be valid for anyone that gets a hold of it[1]. [1]http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#WhatDoesWrittenO...
- daemin 11y agoI think I didn't expand my comment enough. In this context (of software running a car), the manufacturer needs to provide a way of getting the GPL'd source code to anyone that owns a vehicle with the relevant binary running in the car. Basically you don't lose your GPL software right if you've bought the car from someone else other than the manufacturer.
- cyphar 11y agoOnce they give a copy to one owner, that owner can distribute it publicly.
- tremon 11y agoThis is only allowed under GPLv3, iiuc. Under GPLv2, you are obliged to distribute (host) the sources yourself even if it's an unmodified upstream version.