4 ms·
I agree with the previous poster. As someone who works in the field, I find a lot of the analysis very conspiratorial when often the correct explanation is some
by jnordwick 11y ago
I agree with the previous poster. As someone who works in the field, I find a lot of the analysis very conspiratorial when often the correct explanation is somebody had a bug.
"Never assume bad intentions when assuming stupidity is enough" -- Hanlon's Razor
- PhantomGremlin 11y agooften the correct explanation is somebody had a bug That's true in general. But there are literally billions of dollars in play every day on Wall Street. One quip I've heard is IIRC "there are no coincidences on Wall Street". Never assume bad intentions when assuming stupidity is enough Wall Street does not, in general, employ stupid people. Stoned, perhaps (c.f. Jimmy Cayne), but not stupid.
- nanexllc 11y agoI welcome debate over specific topics. I demand specific examples from wild accusations. Since I've published over 3000 pages (and have never had to retract a single page), you have plenty to chose from. BTW, what have you published?