6 ms·
Good info, however CacheFly plans seem to top out at 1,200 GB/month (unless you want to pay overages), this seems really low. If you're running a site where yo
by modoc 17y ago
Good info, however CacheFly plans seem to top out at 1,200 GB/month (unless you want to pay overages), this seems really low. If you're running a site where you really need a super fast CDN, it seems like you could burn through 1,200 GB very quickly. At SoftLayer I get 2 TB/mo per server, so I have some sites that have 30+ TB/mo transfer allotted, and most of them push way more than 1,200 GB each month.
Is there really a good use case for a CDN with such low capacity?
- andrewvc 17y agoI was recently looking at CDNs, and the thing about CacheFly that I found unsettling was that their admin interface looks like it was cobbled together by an engineer, not a designer, around 5 years ago (which may be confirmed by the 2005 copyright notice on it). While that's not what their core competency is, it was just too unsettling to commit to a provider that can't provide a professional interface to their clients. See for yourself: https://www.cachefly.com/admin/ https://www.cachefly.com/admin/ . The pages inside the admin area look even worse.
- andrewvc 17y agoI'm not sure why I got down voted for this. How can you expect a provider to perform their core mission well if they can't even get the basics right?
- mahmud 17y agoEveryDNS has the most atrocious interface, but the best service out there. Anecdote for anecdote :-)
- ableal 17y agoSome professional tools are downright ugly. Pretty is more important in the consumer space. To tell the truth, in some cases, if you make it too pretty, the customer may suspect he's being sold consumer-grade crap ... (I didn't downvote you, btw.)
- andrewvc 17y agoI agree with you in general, but that only works when you can objectively analyze a tool before buying / committing to it. The CDN market is tough because things like reliability and service can be impossible to measure till the shit goes down. The problem with providers in the CDN (and hosting) space is they all sell you the same line of BS. We've got the fastest hardware the most reliability, etc. They all have tests that show that they're the fastest in some way, and they'll always tell you that their caching algorithm is more than generous and perfect for you. They may even tell you that their competitors are overselling or cutting corners. You'll have no way to verify much of this really. Basically, what I look for, after I'm sure the essential features are present, is proof that a company is run by responsible smart people with a commitment to their customers. There's really no good way to do this, companies can seem fine when they're trying to get you to sign, then turn into shit afterwards, but I do the best I can with the hints available. That said, the sales guy and sales-engineer I spoke to at CacheFly seemed smart and professional. Their network sounded like it was reasonably constructed. With the absurdness of their admin area, and their lack of larger clients, I just didn't feel like I was going with a first class operation. I could've forgiven one of those two, but put together, that was disconcerting.
- kierank 17y agoGood info, however CacheFly plans seem to top out at 1,200 GB/month (unless you want to pay overages), this seems really low. That's because if you want more than 1200GB it's not unreasonable to have a tailor-made quote. (e.g. with geographical weighted pricing)
- moe 17y agoPerhaps also have a look at SimpleCDN. Their pricing looks fair and no need to mess with tailor-made quotes over 3 digit amounts...