The All-in cost is why it's not cost effective if you're not using it for an enormous step-up in responsibility or change in field. For someone looking to marg

The All-in cost is why it's not cost effective if you're not using it for an enormous step-up in responsibility or change in field. For someone looking to marginally improve their standing, it doesn't help. A 30 year old director who wants to be in the same company isn't improved. Or should go to an exec program on the company dollar. But there is no better way to get into strategy consulting or investment banking if you're not there already. And if you have a soft undergrad that isn't taken seriously, the right top 6-8 MBA will. To your point - there are many cheaper, faster and more effective ways to accomplish most of the goals if you're already successful. (Except for learning Accounting - it's impossible to learn unless a school is forcing you and giving you exams. It's just too boring otherwise.)