3 ms·
That's a bit different than your previous post. You simply said Googler's in general which there is nothing wrong with that. Now if they currently have a stake
by BinaryIdiot 11y ago
That's a bit different than your previous post. You simply said Googler's in general which there is nothing wrong with that. Now if they currently have a stake in the company AND are working for the government? Yeah I agree with you.
Though I'm not going to lie it still may be better than the current situation. I can't tell you how many times you hear "yeah setup a shell corporation and do this and that and get rich on government contracts". Maybe it's just replacing one corruption for another...