> I'm interested in why LLVM was disqualified. They simply used what they knew best: > If step one had been "learn the GCC or LLVM toolchains well enough to a

> I'm interested in why LLVM was disqualified. They simply used what they knew best: > If step one had been "learn the GCC or LLVM toolchains well enough to add segmented stacks", I'm not sure we'd have gotten to step two. > Honestly, if we'd built on GCC or LLVM, we'd be moving so slowly I'd probably have left the project years ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8817990 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8817990