4 ms·
I don't think that's what was meant, but rather that ocamlbuild sucks. It's not the best.
by samwgoldman 11y ago
I don't think that's what was meant, but rather that ocamlbuild sucks. It's not the best.
- 12121091872 11y agoI'm curious: The configuration file syntax is odd, but otherwise it tends to work. What are the additional problems?
- LeonidasXIV 11y agoThe others are even worse. I tried using OMake and apart from having some neat features like watching files and automatically recompiling it was an incredible pain of setting it up - mainly due to the strange programming language used in its build files. Also, it has seen 0 updates in the last years. It already starts with the compiler, calling them manually is quite a pain, especially if you want include any kind of library, which is why ocamlfind is such a huge win.
- nv-vn 11y agoOasis isn't that bad apart from a few options that are tricky to get (or the fact that, as far as I know, there's no sane way to make it install executables to your ocamlfind directory, which makes it fairly unsuitable for PPX extensions). For the most part, it's about as easy/intuitive as using Cabal.
- LeonidasXIV 11y agoYes, I am using it too, but too bad it is basically unmaintained since its author moved to work for Google. I had hoped it could generate many more files like config for Merlin or Makefiles for build systems than ocamlbuild.
- mercurial 11y agoYou may be interested in https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam-user-setup https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam-user-setup
- fsloth 11y agoAh, yes, I parsed it wrong.