4 ms·
Serious question, and sorry(?) for bringing this up. But is everyone here really okay with reacts licencing? Apart from stubbornly refusing to accept embedding
by yexponential 11y ago
Serious question, and sorry(?) for bringing this up. But is everyone here really okay with reacts licencing?
Apart from stubbornly refusing to accept embedding html in js directly is a good idea (although I see the pros), licencing is the main reason I avoid this ecosystem altogether. Even though it has an outstanding community.
perhaps I'm making a deal out of nothing.
In any case will definitely take the course, im sure it will be as excellent as the others. Many thanks for your efforts Tyler.
- SiVal 11y agoWhat specifically about the licensing? This is an actual question, not advocacy. IIRC, Facebook had a provision that disallowed use of React for a ridiculously broad range of offenses with respect to any of FBs intellectual property but that they narrowed it considerably last year to a more reasonable: you aren't allowed to use any of our intellectual property in React if you dispute our ownership of that specific property. I could be characterizing this incorrectly, or you could be referring to something I'm not aware of, so what specifically are you objecting to?
- Dr_tldr 11y agoI don't know how much the course goes into this, but it might help you get started to keep in mind that it's not HTML in JS, it's xml-like JSX syntax as syntactic sugar for regular JS function calls. It's no more "embedded HTML" than something like $("<p>").text("lolwut").appendTo("body"), just written with a different syntax. Good luck!