Not taking sides here, but this view is fine as long as everything is explicitly detailed in unambiguous language. For example, the 4th Amendment protects agai

Not taking sides here, but this view is fine as long as everything is explicitly detailed in unambiguous language. For example, the 4th Amendment protects against "unreasonable" search and seizure. There is a lot of leeway in what is or isn't reasonable. If you believe in the system you should be glad it is going to the courts - it is the job of the judicial branch to interpret the law. And however it comes out will be a precedent for the future.