> The top line takeaway on DROWN for most people seems to be "export ciphers are evil". I think: (a) boring! (b) misses the more important point. The US govern

> The top line takeaway on DROWN for most people seems to be "export ciphers are evil". I think: (a) boring! (b) misses the more important point. The US government never misses a propaganda opportunity: "uncrackable crypto and impenetrable devices are evil". But technical people so easily miss the marketing value of sound bites. This is a clear-cut case in which yet another major Internet security vulnerability is significantly caused by US government policy. Why shouldn't we run with this as a way to explain to the public why regulation of crypto is bad?