3 ms·
I meant their particular authoring tools, which output Flash rather than HTML5. They could adjust them to output HTML5 with Flash fallback, and that would be a
by bensummers 17y ago
I meant their particular authoring tools, which output Flash rather than HTML5.
They could adjust them to output HTML5 with Flash fallback, and that would be a Good Thing. But it seems odd to keep on going with a poorly integrated[1] plugin which duplicates the work done in open HTML+JS runtimes available everywhere from desktops to smartphones[2].
1) eg Flash 'cookies' which don't get wiped when you delete your cookies in the browser.
2) And 'superphones', of course. :-)
- voidpointer 17y agoSo we agree that there is a lot of room for innovation in the space of tools enabling people to output to the HTML5 stack.
- bensummers 17y agoAbsolutely. And it would be a good thing, since every new internet connected platform is going to implement an HTML5 runtime, and the more people who can create stuff the better.