4 ms·
Oh good grief, not this again.
by mercurial 11y ago
Oh good grief, not this again.
- Jgrubb 11y agoYou knew it was coming.
- rlx02 11y agoYeah, we shouldn't mention bad company behavior on a thread about... bad company behavior.
- manarth 11y agoThe ethicality/morality of a potential supplier is a legitimate consideration for many organisations, and in some cases is written into the organisation's policies. For example, WWF procurement[1]: > "We monitor and select goods and services carefully to avoid those that are harmful or damaging to both the user and the environment." > "we require suppliers to complete an environmental and ethical questionnaire" Whether you agree with the behaviour, disagree, or even don't care, it's a legitimate question to raise when talking about alternative suppliers. [1] http://www.wwf.org.uk/about_wwf/other_publications/environmental_report/environmental_report_archive/environmental_report_20072/procurement/ http://www.wwf.org.uk/about_wwf/other_publications/environme...
- reality_czech 11y agoWhy would the world wrestling federation make their suppliers fill out a questionaire? Is the first question "do you smell what the rock is cooking?"
- mercurial 11y agoI'm absolutely for more ethical companies (though clearly there is a long road ahead), it's the specific example of Adria Richards, which often generates an endless series of venomous posts, that I object to. Not to mention the way the case is summarized by parent is, let's say, highly debatable.