4 ms·
If she has a software patent, it could mean she understands how the system works, you wouldn't hire a lawyer who doesn't have a title, on the other hand, one th
by xlayn 11y ago
If she has a software patent, it could mean she understands how the system works, you wouldn't hire a lawyer who doesn't have a title, on the other hand, one that has written a law would appear more knowledgeable.
What I suspect is the problem is this
"The Board tasked me with making changes to serve the next generation and ensure our impact in the future,"
I would suspect if this is not political correct wording for "let's make money".
- booop 11y ago> If she has a software patent, it could mean she understands how the system works, you wouldn't hire a lawyer who doesn't have a title, on the other hand, one that has written a law would appear more knowledgeable. You're being too considerate. It's not like hiring a lawyer who's written a law or has a title. It's like saying a lawyer needs to commit a crime to be a better lawyer.
- Someone1234 11y ago> It's like saying a lawyer needs to commit a crime to be a better lawyer. That's a ridiculous analogy. I am no fan of software patents either but likening them to a crime is just absurd.
- marrs 11y agoa bit like file sharing then
- zaphar 11y agoExcept that software patents are not criminal, they are legal. You may wish they weren't but they are. His analogy is far more appropriate than yours. I also wish software patents didn't exist. But I'm not foolish enough to think I can pretend they don't.